French Government has set aside €291M to enable reimbursing non-residents for wrongly collected CSG and CRDS
June 18th 2015
Olivier Cadic, the French Senatorial Representative for
non-resident French citizens, has announced that the French
Government has set aside a provision of €291M to repay
non-residents CSG and CRDS wrongly collected on immovable
profits and capital gains. They have been forced to following the
recent upper court decision of the Conseil d'Etat, which had to go
under the yoke of the CJEU judgement. This was the last final
Court of appeal in France available to the administration, which
clearly has no intention of respecting Union norms. The gain
to the French treasury lies in the limited period which it is
required to repay. There is a period of unlawful collection which
escapes.
Whether the CJEU would tolerate this were the issue to be
brought before it is another matter, irrespective of the budgetary
consequences for a Member State seeking to enrich itself over a
long term outside EU rules.
Repayment claims by UK residents are relatively straightforward.
We can assist here.
Any reimbursement claim by a Channel Islander or Manx resident
needs to be carefully reasoned and prepared, as the CJEU deciions
was issued onthe basis that the CSG CRDS was a disguised social
security contributiuon, not a tax. Channel Islanders are
generally outside the EU social security one stop NI contributions.
Speak to Peter for assistance here.
However, they should not be shy of claiming reimbursement or
challenging assessment to the outlawed article 164C CGI income tax
assessement on three times the annual rental value of any
properties available to them in France, nor to reclaiming the
difference between the 16% capital gains rate previously paid by
residents and the 1/3 non-resident rate to which they mauy
have been subjected. This has also been outlawed as discriminatory
by the CJEU.
Whilst this was clearly obtaining a fiscal advantage by a
deception, the question of whether the French administration has
given up on this type of hidden requalification in other areas can
be simply answered; in the negative.